ESG Report: EEXI & CII Fleet Analysis

In November 2020 (MEPC 75), the IMO approved amendments to MARPOL Annex VI to introduce a new technical efficiency standard for in-service vessels – the ‘Energy Efficiency Existing Ship Index’ (EEXI). The standard was adopted in June 2021 (MEPC 76), along with the issuance of the necessary guidelines on baselines, methods of calculations and ship-segment-specific requirements.


The EEXI will impose a requirement equivalent to Energy Efficiency Design Index (EEDI) Phase 2 or 3 (with some adjustments) to all existing ships regardless of the year of build. It is expected that the EEXI will require to be verified and a new International Energy Efficiency Certificate (IEEC) issued no later than the first annual International Air Pollution Prevention (IAPP) survey on or after 1 January 2023.

Amendments to the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL) Annex VI entered into force on 1 November 2022. Developed under the framework of the Initial IMO Strategy on Reduction of GHG Emissions from Ships agreed in 2018, these technical and operational amendments require ships to improve their energy efficiency in the short term and thereby reduce their greenhouse gas emissions.


From 1 January 2023, it will be mandatory for all ships to calculate their attained Energy Efficiency Existing Ship Index (EEXI) to measure their energy efficiency and to initiate the collection of data for the reporting of their annual operational carbon intensity indicator (CII) and CII rating.

OVERVIEW OF THE REPORT

This document calculates the EEXI for a fleet of vessels, the required EEXI level and the required CII. Further, it assesses if the vessels comply with the EEXI requirements.


To comply with the regulation, the attained EEXI for a vessel must be less than or equal to the required EEXI. Once this condition is ascertained or achieved through appropriate measures, the owners will need to prepare an EEXI Technical File, for the certifying body to verify compliance with EEXI. In addition, ships using EPL to comply with EEXI should develop an Onboard Management Manual (OMM) using the guidance which will be approved by the IMO in June 2021.

PORTFOLIO OVERVIEW

A fleet of 28 ships was analysed for the purpose of EEXI and CII compliance. The vessels are classed as Oil and Chemical tankers and are trading worldwide.

The average vessel age is 10,1 years, with an aggregated Gross Tonnage of 705K.

PORTFOLIO UTILISATION METRICS

The fleet utilization metrics are used in the transport efficiency calculation, to obtain the CII. Skytek has calculated the voyage metrics for the fleet of interest and represented relevant data.

Adding to a commercial performance overview, Skytek mapped the yearly averages of voyage metrics and a graphical distribution of the ratio of the time spent in port, idle or carrying cargo between ports for the vessels in the fleet have been represented in Figure 1, with a comparative view for the past three years.

Figure 1 - Past three years of fleet utilization metrics

The sailing performance for each of the vessels is available to be analyzed for the past five years and Skytek represented the fleet sailing performance during 2021 Skytek mapped at a ship granular level the sailing performance for the fleet of interest during the year 2021 in Figure 2.

VOYAGE DATA TABLE

Period: 2021-01-01 - 2021-12-31

No.

Asset Name

IMO

MMSI

Distance (NM)

Avg Speed (kts)

Voyage Duration (Days)

Loitering Duration (Days)

Port Calls Duration (Days)

Port Call Count

1

###

###

###

53,204

9.83

225.55

76.53

62.93

20

2

###

###

###

49,564

9.39

219.97

87.45

57.57

26

3

###

###

###

48,493

9.55

211.47

103.06

50.48

18

4

###

###

###

59,178

10.92

225.89

95.53

43.58

23

5

###

###

###

68,443

10.85

262.75

59.49

42.77

23

6

###

###

###

49,614

9.95

207.72

109.59

47.69

23

7

###

###

###

65,954

10.49

261.95

68.07

34.98

25

8

###

###

###

64,008

10.84

245.99

61.59

57.43

25

9

###

###

###

73,867

12.36

248.99

78.94

37.07

22

10

###

###

###

55,269

10.43

220.81

89.57

54.62

28

11

###

###

###

54,763

10.63

214.70

77.82

72.48

26

12

###

###

###

57,540

9.58

250.38

69.51

45.10

22

13

###

###

###

55,174

10.98

209.42

113.70

41.88

19

14

###

###

###

67,966

11.03

254.02

60.65

50.33

27

15

###

###

###

61,668

10.72

239.70

63.94

61.36

29

16

###

###

###

55,467

10.99

210.35

95.29

59.36

33

17

###

###

###

74,849

11.12

280.42

47.06

37.52

19

18

###

###

###

67,461

10.81

260.03

56.92

48.05

29

19

###

###

###

67,101

11.23

249.06

68.12

47.82

21

20

###

###

###

69,832

10.47

277.83

51.42

35.75

18

21

###

###

###

53,816

10.46

214.42

85.83

64.75

32

22

###

###

###

11,551

8.84

237.06

25.08

38.25

12

23

###

###

###

62,681

10.73

243.35

77.07

44.58

22

24

###

###

###

45,224

9.67

194.93

102.83

67.24

26

25

###

###

###

66,306

10.32

267.65

73.54

23.81

16

26

###

###

###

55,316

10.23

225.25

90.73

49.03

26

27

###

###

###

39,056

9.94

163.63

59.73

72.94

21

28

###

###

###

44,159

10.14

181.47

124.44

59.09

21

Figure 2 – Ship level voyage metrics during 2021

PORTFOLIO ESTIMATED EEXI AND CII

Skytek’s intelligence platform calculated the energy efficiency required metrics and found the fleet compliant for 2021, as represented in Figure 3:

PORTFOLIO DATA TABLE

Figure 3 - Fleet energy efficiency overview for 2021

No.

Asset

IMO

Flag

Type

Owner

Insured Value

Estimated Market Value

Risk Score

Environmental Rating

EEXI (gCO2/t.nm)

1

###

###

Marshall Islands

Products Tanker

###

€15.0M

€13.2M

16

C

5.69

2

###

###

Marshall Islands

Products Tanker

###

€10.0M

€13.1M

11

B

5.61

3

###

###

Marshall Islands

Products Tanker

###

€15.0M

€13.0M

19

B

5.61

4

###

###

Singapore

Products Tanker

###

€25.0M

€16.8M

19

C

6.64

5

###

###

Marshall Islands

Chemical/Products Tanker

###

€30.0M

€22.6M

17

B

6.64

6

###

###

Marshall Islands

Chemical/Products Tanker

###

€30.0M

€22.6M

17

C

6.14

7

###

###

Marshall Islands

Chemical/Products Tanker

###

€18.0M

€24.2M

17

B

4.88

8

###

###

Marshall Islands

Chemical/Products Tanker

###

€18.0M

€24.2M

22

B

5.42

9

###

###

Marshall Islands

Chemical/Products Tanker

###

€18.0M

€22.6M

11

B

4.67

10

###

###

Marshall Islands

Chemical/Products Tanker

###

€18.0M

€22.6M

11

B

6.63

11

###

###

Marshall Islands

Chemical/Products Tanker

###

€18.0M

€24.1M

21

B

5.35

12

###

###

Marshall Islands

Chemical/Products Tanker

###

€22.0M

€24.2M

19

B

4.68

13

###

###

Marshall Islands

Chemical/Products Tanker

###

€18.0M

€24.1M

11

B

4.64

14

###

###

Marshall Islands

Chemical/Products Tanker

###

€18.0M

€22.6M

09

B

5.2

15

###

###

Marshall Islands

Chemical/Products Tanker

###

€32.0M

€21.8M

09

B

5.03

16

###

###

Marshall Islands

Chemical/Products Tanker

###

€32.0M

€21.8M

09

B

5.04

17

###

###

Marshall Islands

Chemical/Products Tanker

###

€25.0M

€16.6M

17

B

6.84

18

###

###

Marshall Islands

Chemical/Products Tanker

###

€25.0M

€16.6M

17

B

6.82

19

###

###

Marshall Islands

Chemical/Products Tanker

###

€25.0M

€16.6M

14

B

6.63

20

###

###

Marshall Islands

Chemical/Products Tanker

###

€25.0M

€16.6M

17

B

6.58

21

###

###

Marshall Islands

Chemical/Products Tanker

###

€30.0M

€33.9M

09

B

5.72

22

###

###

Marshall Islands

Chemical/Products Tanker

###

€30.0M

€33.9M

17

B

5.61

23

###

###

Marshall Islands

Chemical/Products Tanker

###

€30.0M

€33.9M

09

B

6.21

24

###

###

Germany

Chemical/Products Tanker

###

€22.0M

€11.5M

20

B

6.25

25

###

###

Marshall Islands

Chemical/Products Tanker

###

€30.0M

€33.9M

09

B

5.05

26

###

###

Liberia

Chemical/Products Tanker

###

€22.0M

€8.5M

15

B

6.48

27

###

###

Portugal

Chemical/Products Tanker

###

€22.0M

€7.2M

23

B

5.2

28

###

###

Cook Islands

Chemical/Products Tanker

###

€22.0M

€6.6M

33

B

5.2

Figure 4 – Fleet overview data

CONCLUSION

With the entire portfolio complying with the EEXI, 89% of the fleet rated on the operational carbon intensity index at B and only three ships rated at C, the Owner of the fleet does not have to take any mandatory action to improve the fleet’s performance.

Available energy efficiency optimization steps, such as those listed below, are not required:

  • Engine Power Limitation (EPL)
  • Installing energy-saving devices like rotating sails, bulbous bow or propeller fins


However, to improve commercial efficiency and ensure maintaining the attained ratings.

Owners can consider:

  • Trim and draft optimization
  • Propeller polishing
  • Hull Cleaning
  • Speed management
  • Weather routing

EO satellite image providers:

Disclaimer

The content in this report is provided for general information only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which any reliance should be placed. Skytek advises that professional or specialist advice is obtained before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of this report.

The contents of this report is provided in good faith but Skytek make no representations, warranties or guarantees, whether express or implied, that the contents of this report is accurate, complete or up to date.

To the extent permitted by law, Skytek will not be liable for any loss or damage, whether in contract, tort (including negligence), breach of statutory duty, or otherwise, even if foreseeable, arising under or in connection with use or reliance on any content of this report. In particular, Skytek will not be liable for any loss of profits, sales, business or revenue, business interruption, loss of anticipated savings, loss of business opportunity, goodwill or reputation or any indirect or consequential loss or damage whatsoever or howsoever caused.

Login